Science Forbes published an article that stated the obvious deficiency of one of our most famed superheroes.

Superman should be black.

After a brief reminder on photosynthesis, and explaining the pigmentation spectrum known on earth and what’s possible on other planets, even a fictitious Krypton, JV Chamary breaks down why Superman, who gets his fuel from the earth’s sun, would no doubt be super-hue-man. “When photons hit a pigment molecule, its electrons gain enough energy to leave their associated atoms…Photosynthetic organisms on distant worlds would use whichever pigments are most appropriate to the available wavelengths of light.”

Photo: giphy
Photo: giphy

There are some things not too often considered, but once stated, sound too much like right to ignore. Once the tweet went out though, the real kryptonite of information set people off as expected.

Well, actually…

But my man here finished the article and got the actual juice

Some people said they already knew what was up

And added more facts to the debate

But this user wasn’t for this mix up of facts

Sis…

This guy’s got a point

But this guy’s my favorite

And then the author just shut it down in the comments

Photo: forbes
Photo: forbes

The point of the article wasn’t necessarily about race, but as these comments and mentions point out, we’re willing to suspend all scientific evidence of magic when the subject is pale and just take a superhero as a superhero, but have some melanin thrown in the mix…and it’s just make believe, right?

Photo: giphy
Photo: giphy

What do you think? Should Superman have some melanin the next time we see him on screen or in print?

Photo: gifsec
Photo: gifsec

READ NEXT: How the PWI vs HBCU debate resurfaced again