Forest Whitaker

Just before I interviewed director Lee Daniels (HERE) I spoke with actor and producer Forest Whitaker about his new film The Butler, as well as Fruitvale Station and a few
other things.

Though this was the first time I had ever met him, one
thing was for sure: It’s definitely true what everyone says about him in the
business. Whitaker is genuinely one of nicest and warmest guys you’ll ever meet
(and as you will see later during our talk) quite profound as well.

(Warning! Some plot spoilers are revealed in the
interview so you’re forewarned)

I have to tell you first of all those final scenes in The Butler when you’re
playing your character, Cecil Gaines, in his 80’s reminded me so much of my father
at  that age. You even sort of look like
him. But there’s a certain way that old men have, in particular black men at
that age, when they walk with that weight of history and experiences they have
had though their life. There’s a way that they move with a particular gait with a
dignity and pride of themselves. How did you get into that mindset?

you so much. I worked on it a couple of ways. I did work on the physical movement
and the character, but the difference was that I made the physical aging of the
character based on the experiences that he goes through in the movie. So the loss
of my son would resonate here (Whitaker touches
his heart
) in this part of my body. So for the rest of the movie I would
carry something in this part. And then later I would carry something else (touches his side) here. 

So finally
all this stuff from my past takes a toll which is probably why you feel the
weight of it. Because actually I really put the weight of all the life and the moments
into my body and my speech. It changes everything. For example I’m young, but
then this thing happens when my mother gets raped and it changes the way I
talk. Then my son dies and then my voices changes again it come down here (points to his stomach), but I’m still
the same. It’s just putting those things together.

those life experiences that Cecil goes though that changes him physically.

Yes, you always carry your experiences and pain. And that
was one aspect of the things I was doling while I was working on this
part.  It’s one of the most complicated
characters that I’ve ever worked on, though some people will perceive it as
such a simple, simple character.

of acting there are basically two methods  – there’s the Lee Strasberg Actor’s Studio method
where you “become the person” style of acting and then there’s the more technical
more “British” or old fashioned Hollywood way of acting – a sort of no fuss, know
your lines, hit your mark and move on. Which one would you consider yourself to

Well one of the schools I went to originally was the Drama Studio London. But the reality is
that people would consider me a method actor because I stay in character a lot
and I do a lot of homework and immerse myself into the role. But I use the
other more technical side too, so it’s a blend of the two things. I may know physically
my body might digress and I still have to emotionally put in memories and
things so it’s a blending. 

Now when I was doing The Last King of Scotland everyone would tell you that I was that
character always off the set when you talked to me on the phone, or whatever. And
I guess with this character of Cecil, Lee and other people would tell you me
that I was always sort of talking with that accent or voice.

you’re one of those actors who stays in character always or can you switch it
off when the director yells “Cut! Print!”?

I just can’t switch it off, but I can say that I don’t
inflict my behavior on people. Like if the character is nasty, I’m not nasty to
people in my life off camera. But there are certain aspects that stay with me,
the way I move, the way I say a certain word or the way I laugh. Like it took a
long time to get rid of one sound: “Uh” when I was working on Last
King. It took like a year. It would be there in my speech. And with Cecil, because of the meticulous nature of it I would keep some of it but also because
I broke it down so specifically too it was easier for me to recognize that I
was keeping some of it and I could let go of it. Like “Oh why am I walking like this? I
know this is not the way I normally move or speak.”

you know there are people who have some trouble with this film: “Oh why are we playing servants again
?” sort of reaction.  First
of all how do you deal with that controversy and second where does that come

Well I think people have been striving for their sense of
identity and sense of power and feel that in order to move forward that you
have to negate certain things in the past. I think that you have to look historically
and recognize that there are figures who maybe we’ve misjudged, but they are
figures who have been the building blocks of your culture. And besides the fact
that to relegate that this particular type of job doesn’t have dignity or doesn’t
require us to recognize that it is something that special and divine as any
other job might be, you know what I mean? It is a question in itself. Because
these people still exist, maids and butlers.

But I think for the people to feel that we need diverse
images, that is the bigger question. That we can have films that depict this particular
character who happens to be a butler or this particular character who happens to
be human rights leader or this particular character who happens to be a slave
or this particular character who happens to be a drug dealer. I think the
palate of diversity is what people really want. They want to see all the faces
of who they are. 

Now recognize that in all those faces are the faces of
humanity because we come in so many variations, you see? That, to me, is a legitimate
question. Are we seen enough in the faces of who we are, the depth of who we
are? And if we examine a particular character, do we go inside of him enough to
understand more about him and ourselves? The connection that that character
might have with ourselves.

I have to ask you about Fruitvale Station, of course, which you executive produced.
The writer and director Ryan Coogler said that he pitched to you several
projects but when he told you about the Oscar Grant project he had in mind that
was the one that got you excited. What was it about that project that made you say
“You’ve got a film here” that I want to get
on board?

Because I felt he was going to put a human face on an
issue that would deepen our understanding of this situation you know what I
mean? The paint a story as a real human story. The person, yes, is flawed because
of the choices that he has to make in his environment. But we still explore him
and find out his human nature besides all of those things, besides the
prison, besides the drug deals, besides wherever he’s going on. 

We latch and
feel for this human being and recognize that he deserves qualities of life. The
certain kinds of qualities of life – of life, liberty, food, education for the
mind, all these things. People deserve those rights. And this person, in a way,
is trying to reach for those rights throughout the whole movie and then those
rights are taken away from him, He is a symbol of our own humanity so that when
we watch him, we feel for him.

And also let me say this. These things should not be
ignored. Empowerment come from acknowledgement. One of the first steps of healing
is for us to see ourselves and to have our voices be heard. For a person to say
is important This movie says “I’m here” and not just “I’m here,
“I’m here with you. Do you feel me? Do you feel me?”